With the arrival of the TRANSFORMERS movie on Earth, all fanboys scream with delight. It’s pure, unadulterated eye-popping action with slam-bang cinema-shaking explosions that would make your grandma believe World War III has just started. Pure bliss for the boys again as the film transforms into a hormonal teenager’s fantasy: awesomely cool Autobots, majestic Optimus Prime, sensational cars, hot girls who actually care about metamorphosing robots and machineries, and CGI special effects that fit seamlessly into the realistic world of humans.


Whilst tailored with a flawed plot, this sci-fi robot film is generous enough to let our eyes be blown with visuals so exhilarating that it actually makes us believe there has never been a robot film which was made as good as this. This film brings out all the “kids” in adults and actually hauls us back to our youngling days where robots were the most fascinating toys to behold. Such astounding graphics seemed to scream with CGI, but with the latest technology, all computer-graphic animators behind this film must have worked so tremendously hard to bring the clash of titans on the screen.


But it’s not only the battle between Autobots and Decepticons; its central plot revolves around Sam Witwicky (Shia LeBeouf), a high school student, geeky yet cool at the same time, who unconsciously harbours a material that holds an important price to mankind’s survival. After acquiring a hard-earned A-grade in his report, his father gives him a batty, old, yellow Camaro Chevvy, which turns out to be one of the Autobots, Bumblebee. It has a mind of its own as it drives Sam everywhere while impressing hot girl classmate, Mikaela (Maegan Fox), playing tunes that fits the mood yet embarrassingly fits the situation. In a chase for his car one night, he discovers it’s actually a robot, his yellow Chevvy, and signals the space with a light beam on its chest.


The plot is not so difficult to follow at first, as we were first introduced by the God-like, all-powering giant cube, Allspark, which created the world Cybertron and its entire species included. Then following the episode in Qatar, as Capt. Lennox (Josh Duhamel) leads an army in investigating the anomalies happening in the place, they face a massive Decepticon, while a small robot steals secret files from the Air Force One. This all then leads to a major realisation on Sam’s character that he is important to the world, and the Autobots are reckoning Megatron will rise again.


Michael Bay is no stranger to blockbusters. Hard-edged action is his weapon of choice. True from his ARMAGEDDON, PEARL HARBOR and THE ISLAND days, he knows his thing and does very well in it. The shots he included in TRANSFORMERS are so complex, with high-flying shots that felt so ridiculously awesome that you could believe straight away that these robots are so dauntingly realistic. Take the climax of the film for example, as Autobots try to put down the evil Decepticons in a gloriously wild action sequence in a city; it involves technical mastery and camerawork to deliver the finished job in metals and exploding bombs.


Shia LaBeouf as Sam Witwicky generates a sympathetic action hero in him; but unfortunately doesn’t do really well if he wanted to prove his acting chops. But I believe this kid Shia will make it big (bring it on INDIANA JONES 4!) It’s a role made for blockbustering, not for real performance. Megan Fox creates sexual appeal in the film, as her uber-hotness dazzles.


TRANSFORMERS, over all proves to the three-quels of SPIDERMAN, SHREK and PIRATES that summer popcorn era has not yet ended. It’s big, loud, noisy and yet fun. It has an unsure balance between humour and seriousness, and the plot may be a bit shallow (the cube Allstar and Sam’s grandfather’s mysterious coded glasses weren’t too much emphasised even though it holds great importance to the entire story) – but it’s a throwaway, mega-budgeted popcorn flick. It’s better to forgive this, because I admit, I enjoyed watching it with the racketed noise and the blow-up finale that never felt overbloated, although has a kind of ending that screamed of a sequel. Transforming cars, trucks and helicopters are just way cool to ignore.


It’s far from the “classic film” status, but it’s good enough to be a crowd pleaser and a guilty entertainment.




RATING: B+

This film SUNSHINE, the new sci-fi-actioner-horror by British genre-defining director Danny Boyle, is impeccably like the sun, stark with dazzling light, visual wonders, and blinding mysteries. With its ideas, “could-happen” science fiction, psychological observation of humans, spiritual evocations, and the physical risks in outer space – without doubt, we have come across again in what we call an extraordinary outer space movie. SUNSHINE is a spectacular film to behold.


Mankind is at extinction, and the fate of it all was shown in a visceral, breathtaking outer space journey towards our nearest star, the Sun. In 2057, our Sun is dying and Earth is suffering solar winter. The only way to reignite the Sun’s capability is to send a group of humans for mankind’s sake in an exploration and a mission to send a high-powered “payload” or bomb to detonate again its normal activity. In the first scene, the premise is exact and straight to the point, no-nonsense bullshit. Cillian Murphy in an understated performance as Robert Kappa narrates that a former mission was sent to reignite the Sun but failed with unknown status; now it’s their turn, Icarus II, to carry on the mission that would put their lives in jeopardy. But who else then would save mankind?


Enter eight multi-racial scientists: Capt. Kaneda (Hiroyuki Sanada) leads the mission with level-headedness; Robert Kappa (Cillian Murphy, who also starred Boyle’s 28 DAYS LATER), a physicists who’s the centre of the film; Chris Evans’ Mace (brilliant delivery by Evans), a pressurised astronaut who flares up with miniscule mistakes; Rose Byrne’s Cassie displays the film’s emotional core; Michelle Yeoh’s biologist Corazon who takes cares of the plants and grows the food of the ship; and the rest with Troy Garity’s Harvey, Cliff Cutis’ Searle, and Benedict Wong’s faulty Trey who inflicts miscalculations that caused the ship’s disturbance.
It’s hard not to point out how Stanley Kubrick’s 2001: A SPACE ODYSSEY had influenced this film, or how other space epics had seemed to put a seed on this new-age exploration. From the gripping, teeth-chattering sequence (one that wouldn’t let you let go from your seat for a comfort room break) where Kappa and Kaneda exits out of Icarus II to fix the ship’s misfunctioning hydraulics, we notice some excerpts from 2001: A SPACE ODYSSEY, that results in a visual complexity that would knuckle-gnaw your senses. It’s an amazing sight to see someone get flared up in the sun, I promise. Not gory, and a mystery how Danny Boyle managed to pull off the film’s first death scene in such a beautiful, climaxing way.


Then, they face another situation. They discovered Icarus I’s ship being harboured in space very near to the sun, and decides to stop over to use the its bomb. Two shots will be better than one, they reckoned. But this decision leads to much greater risks, as had been foretold by an early miscalculation that one fault move, one change of the ship’s angle, something wrong will happen. Choices had to be made; sacrifices had to be done as more deaths occur. There’s only one final thing that troubles them most: the ship’s oxygen can only accommodate four people, thus letting the crews face a moral dilemma. Should they kill each other to maximize their population to four?


The fourth and final act would have to raise the what-the-hell-was-that tantrum episodes, as the film tries to bring back a character that had survived Sun’s dying power inside a derelict ship within 7 years. Audience might find it a little too impossible, but clearly Danny Boyle and writer Alex Garland (who also reinvents the zombie genre in 28 DAYS LATER) dishes out queries and jumps into a another genre once defined by Ridley Scott’s ALIEN. This suddenly becomes claustrophobic horror as the crew races around the ship, fixing the malfunction while running away from this skinned survivor. This act also deftly regurgitates the infinite battle between science and religion, as the creepy character at the end seemed to have characterised a man blinded by faith yet retrieved his belief when his mission failed that indeed God wants Sun to die and mankind battles with His decision.


If you are planning to see this film and had already read my review, don’t look at me when you thought I said this was such a great film and that you were completely dead over your bollocks about the movie’s ending. Its climax could be a little jarring for some, doing a subtle mix of spirited scenes and eye-popping vistas instead of a whirl-slam-bang grand ovation; in sci-fi tradition, sometimes ending doesn’t necessarily makes sense (blame Kubrick, for Chrissake). But in SUNSHINE, try to look at it in a mannered point of view as you step back to look at its fullness; we see Kappa as he sacrifices his life to finalise a mission that was brought out 16 months before, and as he delivers the last push of the button, he stands as he notices the sparks around him. This scene is particularly beautifully shot, as Kappa raises his hand to feel the wave emitted by the sun, rippling in front of him. We know that this is his spirit as he rejoices in the fulfilment of his purpose. If you haven’t known this, pardon me for spoiling your viewing pleasure.


There are loads of things that are far-cry from possibility level, but we rather forgive rather happily on how the solar panels in Icarus II wouldn’t melt when very near to the sun, or how that creepy skinned guy appears at the end to bring the old one-two horror kind of show. This film is enigmatic enough, just like the former space epics. It’s always worth the post-viewing debate. But SUNSHINE deserves its applause; from majestic visuals that give us a blinding cinematic experience (a budget of $4o million comes in great payoff, a masterclass of budgeting, sense and resourcefulness) , a gripping plot that would hold our nerves mercilessly, and a realistic feel of this ship, in which all gratefulness goes to Danny Boyle for putting humans in Icarus II that has emotions, has the capability to be scared witless and flawed with imperfection.


As what Robert Kappa had said: “If you wake up one morning and find it’s a beautiful day outside, you’ll know we have made it.”


This SUNSHINE has indeed made it.



RATING: A-

In cinema oddity, there are always three auteurs on the list: Lynch, Burton and Gilliam. Fledgling filmmaker Richard Kelly launched this indie flick five years ago and seemed to have threatened these weirdo wonders and made it up recently to the bizarre-movies-of-all-time list. It’s a mysterious feat as DONNIE DARKO also seemed to have captured psychos, brainiacs, and teenage angst alike, making misunderstood individuals become – well, understood – but it’s this unique piece of cinema that makes an impact, not its muddled oftentimes convoluted plot.DONNIE DARKO is a story of a teenager who suffers somnambulism (sleepwalking) and illusions of creepy bunny-mascot killer telling him that the world is going apocalyptic in 28 days. The start of the film is like an attestation that widescreen shots deliver Richard Kelly having a good eye for screens, and as Donnie (a peculiarly appropriate and gratifying performance by Jake Gyllenhaal) wakes up finding himself on a road with his bike, we see a very good string of shots here, and it’s just the beginning.


One of his sleepwalking episodes saved him from being crashed by a jet engine that falls into his bedroom, and he became a local celebrity in his school. Let’s look at the dark side of adolescence, Donnie would have loved to say this, as more mystical visions occur; school started flooding, English teacher (Drew Barrymore, who also co-produced this) began teaching Graham Greene’s youngster anarchists, an unusual love story with new student in town Gretchen (Jena Malone) who felt as though she was attracted to Donnie’s subversive weirdness, Donnie’s chance to time travel using Grandma Death’s old physics book, elongated bubbles coming out of people’s bodies, and more to the killer bunny plot – all of these, mixed together in a narrative jumble.


I can’t help to say this but DONNIE DARKO is that kind of film that shares both light and shade. We could recognise a good piece of craft in a film as easy as determining a healthy apple from a rotten one and this piece isn’t a rotten apple as it’s absolutely a fresh take on cinema. It would remind us how David Lynch would have operated when he was still young and new to the business. Richard Kelly shows the same aura.


While nevertheless flawed, this film suffers from the strength of coherence. I wouldn’t wonder if some people would look apeshits as though they have just been into an incomprehensible, unsolvable Physics or Mathematics test after coming out of this film, because I admit, I was rattling my brain cells together if they were all actually functioning.


Anyhow, DONNIE DARKO, while enjoyed by some, will confound many. It’s not a film for everyone. If you happen to like science fiction mixed with high-school copiousness slash strange love story slash heavy magnetic thriller atmosphere, then you are in the right dark alley. Watch out for some appreciable performance by Jake Gyllenhaal as the eponymous hero. The intensity of the development of the plot was highly interesting and it snakes into a labyrinthine twist yet somehow concluded in an offbeat ending. This Donnie is indeed dark.



RATING: B-

In parody films, especially the ones made nowadays, instead of laughing, we roll our eyes to our heads and wish the credits would arrive sooner. Comedy now is never comedic. Cheers to the lampoonery by Simon Pegg and Edgar Wright for saving the day. HOT FUZZ is a breath of fresh air amid repugnant movie-parodies (I am shouting at you SCARY MOVIES, DATE MOVIES and EPIC MOVIES!). Proven right, there’s still some great humour left in the world, and bless the Brits for sharing us the fun and entertainment.


Simon Pegg, known as unlucky, sympathetic Shaun in the delightful SHAUN OF THE DEAD (whom he had written as well with director Edgar Wright), now stars as Nicholas Angel, a hotshot policeman in London brimming with a fantastic record that would make crime-doers shake with fright. However, he battles the fact that he’s just way too good and must be about a hundred times better than his job mates, not to mention the Chief Police (Bill Nighy). Obviously intimidated by Angel’s too-goodness, they dispatch and assign him into a remote country village of Sandford where the worst crime that was ever recorded was a swan’s escape. Everybody’s too friendly, too green, and too cheerful. Even the presence of minors in a local pub seemed normal, as Angel throws them out single-handedly. One of them happens to be a copper himself, Dan Butterman (Nick Frost, that same corpulent bloke from SHAUN) and the son of the village police chief (Jim Broadbent). Together they impose rules in the village of no crimes at all, and start chasing escaped swans over fences.


But strange accidents started occurring, claiming the lives of the villagers one by one and Angel believes there’s something going on. As Danny himself is a maniacal fan of bullet-shooting actioners of LETHAL WEAPON, POINT BREAK and BAD BOYS, he craves for some slam-bang action he never experienced before and while Angel wanted to prove himself to the village that knows little of him, they both set out to uncover a Lynchian mystery with the deaths involving pub landlords, clergyman and other villagers in the world’s most unbelievable secret organization, leading to a full-throttle smashing, ka-powing, eye-popping action sequence of a climax so hilariously overwrought that makes you stop your clock and enjoy the silly entertainment. This is their homage to Bruckheimer and his explosions, to the swagger of Will Smith and Martin Lawrence of BAD BOYS, to Bruce Willis’ John McClane in DIE HARD films, to Keanu Reeves’ gun-shooting-in-the-air while screaming “Aaaaarrrgh!” in POINT BREAK, and a whole lot more.


Yep, this is a parody and even though it pays homage to loads of action films, it stays fresh with its plot and crisp with its witty, razor-edged script and clever one-liners. It’s absolutely exaggerated that would make you shake your head in funny disbelief but it’s the screenplay that’s intelligent and it has a story that’s generally crazy but highly a guilty pleasure to watch. Edgar Wright directs with a kind of filmmaking that never sleazes or bores, and uses zap, no-nonsense editing that staggers the senses. It’s very much like SHAUN OF THE DEAD with sequences that is both funny, heartfelt and sometimes over the top. Simon Pegg, while brandishing a fragile but fun act in SHAUN, delivers a very controlled character that balances head-held-up-high career to embarrassing dislocation in a village. He’s everything movie stars are made off, never daunted by very high fences or pointed spires. Also, Nick Frost comfortably compliments Pegg as the crappy cop and shows comedic finesse despite of his massive self.


HOT FUZZ is not better than SHAUN OF THE DEAD. This Britcom is as good as the zombie spoof; it doesn’t stick on copying scenes from other films but does use very creative action-movie filmmaking style that gives this a unique blend of comedy, action, humour, mystery and everything out of this world. This collaboration of Simon Pegg and Edgar Wright will surely bring them out of the remote places and into the global mainstream. Just don’t expect you’ll be laughing all the time while watching HOT FUZZ because it’s not a gag show – it’s a grandstand of unique cinema-making, entertaining blips, enjoyable characters and British humour that would appeal only to people with sense.


It’s one of 2007’s most entertaining films so far.




RATING: B+


2007 (c) J.S.Datinguinoo

Usually in the land of sequels, it’s either hit-the-target or a disappointing misfire. This third venture of the grumpy, bulbous-nosed, green ogre Shrek from the swamp slogs the land with moneymaking prowess, but is Shrek’s return to the fantastical Far Far Away, far far too much? Try to jump on a pool of mud and see what happens; it’s head first collision to stinky rottenness. It’s that stupid, ridiculous, plot-stretching that makes this a messy misfire.

Right away, Dreamworks Animation tagged their names as Pixar’s greatest arch-nemesis and dubbed Shrek as the friendliest Scottish ogre in the world. Here in SHREK THE THIRD, not only Shrek confuses with his ‘love thy own self’ (no matter how ugly you are and green your skin is) message but he suffers with a shallow plodding of his father-to-be-image. After rescuing the whole kingdom of Far Far Away, Shrek (voice of Mike Myers) and Fiona (Cameron Diaz) settles as a couple but then was terrorised by the Frog King’s death. Note John Cleese as he performs the most ludicrously unamusing, schmaltzy death scene. Define overkill.

Shrek normally goes out into an adventure saving somebody or something: in the first SHREK, he goes to save a princess, in SHREK 2, he seeks a magical potion, in THE THIRD’s case, he finds the kingdom’s one true heir (horribly unexplained), Artie, who belongs in Worcestershire High aka all-American-high-school with geeks who mutters with “dude” and girls who says “like totally” all the time. If it weren’t for the scandalously misfit Donkey (Eddie Murphy) and the fur-rrific Puss in Boots (Antonio Banderas), Shrek’s journey would have to be one of cinema’s most boring sojourn.
While the green ogre is away, the villains are at play. Prince Charming wanted to be King, as though he was never satisfied with his celebrity status and his soft and bouncy hair. He gathers Hook, With Queen, Rumpeltiltskin and all the fairy tale spoilsports without ever wondering how the hell they ended up in one pub. Together, they overthrow Far Far Away with flying brooms and moving trees (must be nicked from the Ents of Lord of the Rings). On the other side, Fiona gets revenge-feely all over as she also gathers the princesses, Snow White, Sleeping Beauty, Cinderella, Rapunzel and one of the evil step-sisters (horribly unexplained again!). As though a sequel (in this case a three-quel) literally means that it has to have war scenes, everything climaxes with a stage play with slapsticky action sequences, overwrought supposed-to-be humour sidekicks, and unbelievably unsatisfying. Instead of guffawing, stomach heaves with dry sickness. Even the addition of Artie aka King Arthur doesn’t really make a difference and Justin Timberlake’s voice acting is cloying, characterless and dumb.

Sometimes in films, no matter how hard we try to consider some materials, we believe that a good sequel maintains its quality right from the start. No matter how good the visuals are, no matter how superb the animation is, material serves its purpose. The first SHREK, in my opinion, would have to be the most entertaining, brilliantly-conceived fairy tale about an unfairy-like creature on Earth, the massive green ogre with nose hairs emerging. However, it’s no elastic material, they have stretched this too much that it’s already worse for wear. The plot is disastrous, the humour is absent, and everything else is just too hysterically campy for my taste. When they swapped Donkey and Puss In Boots, we could tell straight without looking at them that they had already been digging out holes for ideas. When they added Merlin with his ‘titude, it wasn’t a wise move.

Overkill defined. SHREK THE THIRD had lost out its charm and energy from its predecessors. It feels tired and shows aging, without thoughts and ideas anymore. And yes, they are making Shrek 4, hopefully it would not be litter. This should be summer and never had been yet a very satisfying movie that hit the theatres (C’mon TRANSFORMERS, SIMPSONS and HARRY POTTER! Prove your worth!). All had been suffering the sequelitis disease. Little Shreks are adorably cute though, but so far so bad, all the ha-ha’s of this series had turned har-har on this one.

RATING: C

Coming out after the film, I realised straight away that I had enough of superhero movies. From the summer’s overblown sequels and three-quels, from the crappy SPIDER-MAN 3 to the acceptably tolerable PIRATES 3 (oops, this wasn’t a superhero flick but Capt. Jack Sparrow was larger than life!), here comes the Fantastic Four with a new hubby, the sleek, glistening mass of mercury-like matter, the Silver Surfer. It’s not overly long, not superfluous, not wired with too many subplots; however, it struggles with loads of problems – it is surprisingly short, filled with crappy scenes, cheesy humour, predictable plotting, and most of all, the unsatisfying Galactus whirl of cosmological pretence.

Sure, it’s not a long film, as though director Tim Story had heard a leak of gossip before that SPIDER-MAN 3 was so epic that it runs for more than 3 hours, as well as the overwrought PIRATES 3, he made this FANTASTIC FOUR sequel a short one. Running for about 1 hour and 32 minutes, it still feels very short and all the events were so fleeting like the rush of the Surfer himself over the planet.Glad it’s not fidgety over its plot as they focused to one visitor from outer space and his hidden agenda, the Silver Surfer (brilliant CG motionry by Pan the Faun himself from PAN’S LABYRINTH, Doug Jones and voice my THE MATRIX’s Morpheus, Laurence Fishburne). As Sue Storm aka The Invisible Woman (Jessica Alba) and Reed Richards aka Mr Fantastic (Ioan Gruffud) are about to be wed when wedding vows were disturbed by the arrival of a silvery thingee, with the ultra-magnetic electricity shutdown. Believe me, this is a big dumb movie as shallow as your waddling pool.

Chris Evans as Johnny Storm aka The Human Torch probably enjoyed his role as he brings so much charisma to screen and acts effortlessly, with humour and wit. All the rest, the humour in this film is so cheesy, crappy and not-so-laugh-your-arse shtick, gags and stunts. The wedding’s “skip to the end part” grub is so overused you’d think they’d run out of ideas and thought of it as a romantic comedy. Ben Grimm aka The Thing (Michael Chiklis) becomes a tad softer and his rock cracks don’t seem too engraved with his personality. Reed Richards looked so absurd with his “loosening up” in the dancefloor (second dance sequence in a superhero flick this year, c’mon! Give us a break!) Exempt the fun part where they accidentally swap powers.

I am not really a big fan of Fantastic Four, and I haven’t even seen the first one (gawd, pardon me, shame me face). After watching this, I have decided I will never become one. Plot-wise, there was a mix of being minimalistic and galactic-breadth exaggeration. A cosmic force arrives on earth and gives 8 days before its destruction and the appearance of the inevitable Galactus, which seemed like a remnant from the TWISTER flick. This is a very disappointing part of the film as Galactus, whom Silver Surfer swore fealty to, appears to be like a massive swirl of dark clouds eating the whole Earth. Was this Silver Surfer offered his allegiance to? Alright, we’re not that too stupid. Menace of galactic proportions, my arse. Central London was also destroyed by the arrival that they dig a hole on Thames River (the sequence in which impresses me most) and pulled London Eye out of its hinges (whoah!), finally they took advantage of its larger budget I believe.

But FANTASTIC FOUR: RISE OF THE SILVER SURFER does mediocre things. It is an ordinary superhero movie, and even feels like I was watching a morning cartoon superhero on the telly except they were replaced by live images and real people and places. This fails because it never attempts to be extraordinary. They might have fantastic powers but this film’s existence isn’t compelling enough to take our breaths away. Maybe 12 years old might be deceived, or rather entertained. Adults, all ears and eyes to the screen, crappy script and predictable plotline may come your way. Oh, before I forget, Jessica Alba is such a hottie but was mainly covered with blonde wig, prominent blue contact lenses and some evident skin tanning.

RATING: C

Alright, we’ve had enough of Japanese horror movies, especially scorned girls with overly long hair that badly needs trimming and scares us by means of crawling on the floor. However, THE DEVIL’S BACKBONE came out before the explosion of the Japanese B-movie monopolisation of horror cinema, and Guillermo Del Toro, the genius director behind the magnificent PAN’S LABYRINTH, seemed to have prophesied the coming of this era. It’s no fluke, this horror film, because it doesn’t scare us by mere apparitions and the cue of loud frightening music but relies most in heavy atmospheric moods and tones that creeps in like a slow chill.

This is a fine ghost story that rises near to the level of THE OTHERS. It focuses on the story of a distant orphanage during the Spanish Civil War period with the children were left as only remaining evidences of the devastated left-wing families. Carlos, the newest kid around, was deceived when he was dropped off in the institution without him knowing what happened to his family and discovered four things: 1) there was a tremendous crucifix put on display to disguise the orphanage as a Catholic school, 2) there was a enormous unexploded bomb that was stuck in the courtyard like a sculpture, 3) he sleeps in Bed Number 12, a former bed of a student named Santi who went missing ages ago, and 4) he learns about the students, the friends, the enemies, and the school itself that nothing was normal around it.

We were introduced to the story of Santi. The students refer to him as “the one who sighs”, and in a eerie sequence as Carlos and a bully student meanders into the kitchens at night to get a jug of water, we see Santi for the first time. We know that he’s a ghost but what was brilliant about how Del Toro achieved it was that he never uses the ghost as his main regal shocker; instead he uses the sighs, the situation’s eeriness and the dark atmosphere to convey the film’s effective chill. Then we are moved into another element that is not so childlike ghost story, there are adult themes crosshatched all over it: Jacinto, a former student now janitor, has a lover, the maid Conchita, but elicits an affair with Carmen, the school’s Headmistress, who had a wooden leg of her own. In one of the most disturbing scenes shot here, more horrifying that most scary scene in this film, Jacinto was having sex with the old Carmen with her unsettling wooden leg beside her, and her husband listening in the other room. We also discover that Jacinto was using Carmen to locate the gold bars hidden within the orphanage.

Then as though STAND BY ME suddenly appeared in this film, the boys set out in an adventure that would change their lives forever. They discover the real story behind Santi’s life and I’m not going to disclose it right here but it all involves a pool, a stone and a bloody forehead.

I quite admire this film. Guillermo Del Toro had shown his early signs of his mastery in PAN’S LABYRINTH and even crafted a beautifully shot ethereal ghost story. Watching the film was like sitting in front of the fire or warm lamp during a rainy night, listening to a grandfather’s creepy story. This is a good story because the ghost doesn’t exist without a reason. This DEVIL’S BACKBONE has a brain, heart and a touch of sense. It may not be better than the classic THE OTHERS but it’s nearly as good.

RATING: B+

There was a scene in SHERRYBABY that became an essential core to the film: Sherry (Maggie Gyllenhaal) was so furious when her own daughter stopped calling her “Mom” and realised it with anger rising as she fidgeted in her spot and started slamming the cupboard door. This, with her own personal struggle, she wanted to become the clichéd good-mother-image yet unguarded by her own self-destructiveness.

Maggie Gyllenhaal as the film’s believable, absolutely realistic character as Sherry deserves a proper applause. If not for her, this will film would squander into the mediocre status but since Gyllenhaal gave us a stunning turn as this drug-addicted single mother who wanted to reconnect and straighten things out with her young daughter, we wanted to hate her for being unbelievably foolish yet at the same time sympathise her for being human.

Sherry, who just came out of rehab (this goes out to you all the Lohan’s and Spears’ out there!), comes home again to meet her daughter who was taken care by her brother and his wife. Her reconnection was a massive struggle and she knows it straight by the time she embraces her daughter. To try to redeem herself, she admits herself into a women’s post-drug addiction centre and community service but her dispirited nature steers her away from the right things and does some things she had been wrong of doing before. She shows boobs to get herself the jobs she want and gives out sex as straightforward as handshakes, and the most horrible thing, she induces again into drug habit as she becomes self-destructive, destroying herself without hope. But the exuberance of Sherry’s character maintains her to be a believable character without any hypocrisy and Gyllenhaal sheds off masks and showiness to give a performance that would make audience become arrested; a genuine performance that made her SECRETARY role unquestionable to be the next Oscar bagger of her generation.

We might think that the story is all too familiar, but it’s the direction and the complexity of emotions that make SHERRYBABY a worthy gem. It doesn’t douse into hefty and almost cheesy melodrama and steers clear away from overused happy endings. When we witness Sherry trying to reconnect with her daughter, we understand her intentions and she indeed wanted to become a responsible mother for her child, but it’s her nature within her that was stopping her to become one. Gyllenhaal portrays Sherry as a lost soul trying to find a place in the world but along the way becomes ever so despondent because of her past that couldn’t be changed. The film also doesn’t exploit the character as a wayward person but shows us that it was her childhood that made her the way she is (cue to the scene where she was groped by her own father).

This is a wonderfully nuanced film and its cinematography blends perfectly to Maggie Gyllenhaal’s amazingly natural performance. It might not have boomed out into Oscars department but without doubt, it’s a quietly extraordinary film. It is sorrowful, moving, unpretentious and off-beat inspiring. SHERRYBABY is an honest film, and by that, there’s no question why it should be seen. You might hate or like Maggie Gyllenhaal, but for me she delivered one of 2006’s strongest female performances.

RATING: A-

Try to envision a scene of a domino effect, as the last piece falls down, everything looks like a mess. SPIDER-MAN 3, with all its stacked plots, feckless villains, and the über dark-side spidey ego cockery, is a cluttered chaos. Spiderman shoots web, swings low and falls into the dreary jungle of superhero sequel failures. Damn, I thought SPIDER-MAN 2 was the best made superhero movie in history and was actually biting my tongue and gritting my teeth for this three-quel; now it’s official, this movie had spun a tangled web of disappointment.

This one of the summer’s throw-me-popcorns kind of entertainment shares the same problem with the recent PIRATES OF THE CARIBBEAN: AT WORLD’S END, there’s too much of everything. In PIRATES, there were too many characters, too many plots and too many things happening beneath the furrowed brows of Captain Sparrow and Lord Beckett. Here in SPIDER-MAN 3, there were too much villains, too much backstory, too much melodrama, and way too many tears shed. Plus, Mary Jane sings. Twice. And Peter Parker strutted, and danced.

Did I mention that there were too many villains? Enter Sandman. I believe Thomas Haden Church is a fantastic actor and his role in SIDEWAYS is such an inspiration for those actors nowadays who were lost in the Hollywood limbo of no recruitment, but unfortunately, he was wasted as the escaped con who broke into a Physics Matter lab (as though he never noticed the sign that said WARNING! KEEP OUT! for Christ’s sake! Is the world turning illiterate already?); and was then transformed into the aforementioned Sandman. I believe director Sam Raimi wanted his characters, even his villains, to have an emotional edge, putting backstories that would explain their nature and origin –but this one, putting a heart in the middle of a raging THE MUMMY-like sandstorm is definitely impossible.

Villain number two. Enter Green Goblin. Harry Osborn following the footsteps of his deceased father, and wanting to seek revenge to kill Spiderman slash Peter. And as the plot spins its wildly web, we see Peter hanging out with best friend-turned-enemy-turned-best friend-turned-enemy-turned-best friend-turned-enemy that we say “Enough with it!” Even knowing that Harry had supposedly acquired short-term amnesia from slamming his head on a pipe, it was still unforgivable. My annoyance really raged when Harry’s servant doused out a piece of information at the end that he could have given out earlier in the film and saved too much fighting. Now this might be a proof that the screenwriters were running out ideas already.

Villain number three. Enter slimy, yucky, grimy, unhealthy-looking piece of sh—oops, piece of black crawler which looked like a confused mix of gum, elastic rubber and spaghetti. It was Venom, the goo from a space rock. The origin was left unexplained and more so, why it followed Parker was also left unexplained. Topher Grace as Venom looked so brilliant but his character was mainly one-dimensional. There wasn’t too much room for gooey improvement.

Villain number four. Or shall I say pseudo-villain. When friendly-neighbour SPIDER-MAN was infected with the gooey crawler from space, he gets a new black suit that would make fanboys ooohh with awesomeness. But ditch out the black suit, we see the new Peter Parker character, he was transformed in and out. He becomes more evil, more horny, dancy-feely and more aggressive. If BORAT was a bit Westernised, Parker would act like him. Winking at women, dancing at Times Square like a low-rent boy and swashing that buckle with the hair that fell all over his place like an ignored punk-skater kid. Oh, the eyeliners before I forget.

Of course, as another impeccable definition of the term “blockbustering”, the special effects were slam-bang eye-popping amazing. From the face of Venom to the swaying of Spidey around the Manhattan skyline and skyscrapers, the smashing of buildings and cars, and the mons-terrific villain powers, all were incredible vistas.

It was the storyline that had a problem of its own.

There was even the love triangle between Mary Jane, Peter Parker and the new character Gwen Stacy (Bryce Dallas Howard). Even without the influence of the gooey venom, Parker cheats on Mary Jane by kissing Miss Stacy as a reward for rescuing her. And there was also Mary Jane trying to flirt with Harry during his short-term memory loss episodes. What were the writers thinking about? Then the case of Uncle Ben’s death was resurrected, showing Sandman’s attachment as the convicted killer. Flint Marko aka Sandman tries to get money for his ill daughter then confesses that he didn’t kill Uncle Ben. Tough. I am not rooting for some shallow plot-making. Even the love story of Mary Jane and Peter Parker was put to test, from Mary’s career struggle to Peter’s job rivalry, up to the big finish with Mary Jane dangling way up high in some building, we knew we’ve seen it before, reminiscent of SPIDER-MAN 1. And oh, Spider-man was enjoying the glitz and glamour of fame.

Head scratching and shaking, it was a bit awkward to see Spider-man with his identity crisis. It was not only the character that suffers from this one, also the movie as well. Big-budgeted monster of a movie needs a tougher web spinning plot-wise. So it suffers with Peter Parker’s dilemma, it had no real identity and its crisis was just insufferable with this instalment running way too long. If they’re making SPIDER-MAN 4, just one villain please? And not too much of prodigal, unimportant plots.

RATING: C